Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233879›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

LeTra: a leaf tracking workflow based on convolutional neural networks and intersection over union.

Federico Jurado-Ruiz, Thu-Phuong Nguyen, Joseph Peller, María José Aranzana, Gerrit Polder, Mark G M Aarts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico Jurado-RuizCenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), Cerdanyola, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0534-2734
Thu-Phuong NguyenLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3492-1062
Joseph PellerGreenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0561-1113
María José AranzanaCenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics (CRAG), Cerdanyola, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0240-8021
Gerrit PolderGreenhouse Horticulture, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-4776
Mark G M AartsLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. mark.aarts@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5257-0740

Funding

MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 PRE2019-087427Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek PHOSY.2019.001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of plant photosynthesis is essential for productivity and yield. Thanks to the development of high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) facilities, based on chlorophyll fluorescence imaging, photosynthetic traits can be measured in a reliable, reproducible and efficient manner. In most state-of-the-art HTP platforms, these traits are automatedly analyzed at individual plant level, but information at leaf level is often restricted by the use of manual annotation. Automated leaf tracking over time is therefore highly desired. Methods for tracking individual leaves are still uncommon, convoluted, or require large datasets. Hence, applications and libraries with different techniques are required. New phenotyping platforms are initiated now more frequently than ever; however, the application of advanced computer vision techniques, such as convolutional neural networks, is still growing at a slow pace. Here, we provide a method for leaf segmentation and tracking through the fine-tuning of Mask R-CNN and intersection over union as a solution for leaf tracking on top-down images of plants. We also provide datasets and code for training and testing on both detection and tracking of individual leaves, aiming to stimulate the community to expand the current methodologies on this topic.

resultsWe tested the results for detection and segmentation on 523 Arabidopsis thaliana leaves at three different stages of development from which we obtained a mean F-score of 0.956 on detection and 0.844 on segmentation overlap through the intersection over union (IoU). On the tracking side, we tested nine different plants with 191 leaves. A total of 161 leaves were tracked without issues, accounting to a total of 84.29% correct tracking, and a Higher Order Tracking Accuracy (HOTA) of 0.846. In our case study, leaf age and leaf order influenced photosynthetic capacity and photosynthetic response to light treatments. Leaf-dependent photosynthesis varies according to the genetic background.

conclusionThe method provided is robust for leaf tracking on top-down images. Although one of the strong components of the method is the low requirement in training data to achieve a good base result (based on fine-tuning), most of the tracking issues found could be solved by expanding the training dataset for the Mask R-CNN model.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisConvolutional neural networksImage analysisPhenotypingPhotosynthesisTracking

Identifiers

PMID38233879
PMCPMC10795293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.