Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233857›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Impact of medical insurance access negotiation on the utilization of innovative anticancer drugs in China: an interrupted time series analysis.

Cui Li, Jingmin Zhu, Linghan Shan, Yingyu Zhou, Gang Liu, Hong Zhu, Qunhong Wu, Yu Cui, Zheng Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cui Li *Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Jingmin Zhu *Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Linghan ShanDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Yingyu ZhouScience and Technology Development Center of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association, Peking, China.
Gang LiuDepartment of Acupuncture, Second Affiliated Hospital, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hong ZhuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China. wuqunhong@163.com.
Yu CuiDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China. cuiyu4640@163.com.
Zheng KangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang, China.

Funding

A cooperative project between School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University and Science and Technology Development Center of the Chinese Pharmaceutical Association no award numberNational Social Science Foundation of China 19AZD013Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, China YQ2019G003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high costs of innovative anticancer drugs hinder a number of cancer patients' access to these drugs in China. To address this problem, in 2018, the medical insurance access negotiation (MIAN) policy was implemented, when the prices of 17 innovative anticancer drugs were successfully negotiated and they were therefore included in the reimbursement list. This study aimed to explore the impact of the MIAN policy on the utilization of innovative anticancer drugs.

methodsWith monthly data on drug expenditures and defined daily doses (DDDs) of each innovative anticancer drug from January 2017 to December 2019, interrupted time series analysis was employed to estimate both the instant (change in the level of outcome) and long-term (change in trends of outcomes) impacts of the MIAN policy on drug utilization in terms of drug expenditures and DDDs. Our sample consists of 12 innovative anticancer drugs.

resultsFrom January 2017 to December 2019, the monthly drug expenditures and DDDs of 12 innovative anticancer drugs increased by about 573% (from US$8,931,809.30 to US$51,138,331.09) and 1400% (from 47,785 to 668,754), respectively. Overall, the implementation of the MIAN policy led to instant substantial increases of US$8,734,414 in drug expenditures and 158,192.5 in DDDs. Moreover, a sharper upward trend over time was reported, with increases of US$2,889,078 and 38,715.3 in the monthly growth rates of drug expenditures and DDDs, respectively. Regarding individual innovative anticancer drugs, the most prominent instant change and trend change in drug utilization were found for osimertinib, crizotinib, and ibrutinib. In contrast, the utilization of pegaspargase was barely affected by the MIAN policy.

conclusionsThe MIAN policy has effectively promoted the utilization of innovative anticancer drugs. To ensure the continuity of the effects and eliminate differentiation, supplementary measures should be carried out, such as careful selection of drugs for medical insurance negotiations, a health technology assessment system and a multichannel financing mechanism.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsInsuranceNitrosaminesChinaDrug CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisNegotiatingAntineoplastic AgentsmethylisoamylnitrosamineNitrosaminesChinaDDDsDrug expenditureInnovative anticancer drugInterrupted time seriesMedical insurance access negotiation

Identifiers

PMID38233857
PMCPMC10792910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.