ArticleBMC oral health2024
"Determining the efficacy of a machine learning model for measuring periodontal bone loss".
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Systematic Review.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Pooled it
- Radiographic diagnosis of periodontitis using artificial intelligence: a meta-analysis comparing binary and staging classifications across imaging modalities.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- From Panoramic Radiographs to AI-Assisted Radiographic Periodontal Charting: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Reliability of the QUADAS-2 checklist in AI-based medical imaging: A comparison of human reviewers and ChatGPT-4o.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Deep Learning Models in Detecting Mandibular Furcation Defects on Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fractal Analysis and Artificial Intelligence for Radiographic Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in periodontics and peri-implant medicine: from diagnosis to precision care.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Caries Detection on Bitewing Radiographs: A Comparative Analysis of the Improved Deep Learning Model and Dentist Performance.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025Article
- AI-powered digital probing improves periodontal disease diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- PerioAI: A digital system for periodontal disease diagnosis from an intra-oral scan and cone-beam CT image.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Periodontology: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Evaluation by dental professionals of an artificial intelligence-based application to measure alveolar bone loss.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConsidering the prevalence of Periodontitis, new tools to help improve its diagnostic workflow could be beneficial. Machine Learning (ML) models have already been used in dentistry to automate radiographic analysis.
aimsTo determine the efficacy of an ML model for automatically measuring Periodontal Bone Loss (PBL) in panoramic radiographs by comparing it to dentists.
methodsA dataset of 2010 images with and without PBL was segmented using Label Studio. The dataset was split into n = 1970 images for building a training dataset and n = 40 images for building a testing dataset. We propose a model composed of three components. Firstly, statistical inference techniques find probability functions that best describe the segmented dataset. Secondly, Convolutional Neural Networks extract visual information from the training dataset. Thirdly, an algorithm calculates PBL as a percentage and classifies it in stages. Afterwards, a standardized test compared the model to two radiologists, two periodontists and one general dentist. The test was built using the testing dataset, 40 questions long, done in controlled conditions, with radiologists considered as ground truth. Presence or absence, percentage, and stage of PBL were asked, and time to answer the test was measured in seconds. Diagnostic indices, performance metrics and performance averages were calculated for each participant.
resultsThe model had an acceptable performance for diagnosing light to moderate PBL (weighted sensitivity 0.23, weighted F1-score 0.29) and was able to achieve real-time diagnosis. However, it proved incapable of diagnosing severe PBL (sensitivity, precision, and F1-score = 0).
conclusionsWe propose a Machine Learning model that automates the diagnosis of Periodontal Bone Loss in panoramic radiographs with acceptable performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.