ArticleThrombosis journal2024
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a young patient with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 28-year-old man diagnosed with triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and undergoing warfarin experienced three separate admissions to the cardiac ward within a one-month period due to escalating chest pain. While the initial two admissions revealed normal results in cardiological investigations, such as blood tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography, the third admission unveiled signs of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), despite the patient maintaining an INR (International Normalized Ratio) of 4. Subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) exposed spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) of type 3. Faced with hemodynamic instability and worsening symptoms, the patient underwent stenting and was prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy in addition to warfarin. A follow-up evaluation one month later indicated a normalization of his condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.