Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233708›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Understanding the differential impacts of two antidepressants on locomotion of freshwater snails (Lymnaea stagnalis).

Nandini Vasantha Raman, Asmita Dubey, Ellen van Donk, Eric von Elert, Miquel Lürling, Tânia V Fernandes, Lisette N de Senerpont Domis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nandini Vasantha RamanDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Asmita DubeyDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. A.Dubey@nioo.knaw.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5385-2720
Ellen van DonkDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eric von ElertAquatic Chemical Ecology, Biocenter, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Miquel LürlingDepartment of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Tânia V FernandesDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lisette N de Senerpont DomisDepartment of Aquatic Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Ecology · NLUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cologne · DEWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 260-71001Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek TWM.BL.019.003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence of negative impacts of antidepressants on behavior of aquatic non-target organisms. Accurate environmental risk assessment requires an understanding of whether antidepressants with similar modes of action have consistent negative impacts. Here, we tested the effect of acute exposure to two antidepressants, fluoxetine and venlafaxine (0-50 µg/L), on the behavior of non-target organism, i.e., freshwater pond snail, Lymnaea stagnalis. As compounds interact with chemical cues in the aquatic ecosystems, we also tested whether the effects altered in the presence of bile extract containing 5α-cyprinol sulfate (5α-CPS), a characterized kairomone of a natural predator, common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Behavior was studied using automated tracking and analysis of various locomotion parameters of L. stagnalis. Our results suggest that there are differences in the effects on locomotion upon exposure to venlafaxine and fluoxetine. We found strong evidence for a non-monotonic dose response on venlafaxine exposure, whereas fluoxetine only showed weak evidence of altered locomotion for a specific concentration. Combined exposure to compounds and 5α-CPS reduced the intensity of effects observed in the absence of 5α-CPS, possibly due to reduced bioavailability of the compounds. The results highlight the need for acknowledging different mechanisms of action among antidepressants while investigating their environmental risks. In addition, our results underline the importance of reporting non-significant effects and acknowledging individual variation in behavior for environmental risk assessment.

Indexed as

CarpsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsAquatic OrganismsEcosystemFluoxetineFresh WaterLocomotionLymnaeaSnailsVenlafaxine HydrochlorideAntidepressive AgentsFluoxetineVenlafaxine HydrochlorideWater Pollutants, Chemical5α-cyprinol sulfateBehavioral toxicityFluoxetineGastropodPsychopharmaceuticalSNRISSRIVenlafaxine

Identifiers

PMID38233708
PMCPMC10869440
OpenAlexW4390935866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.