Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233705›Full record

SynthesisCurrent diabetes reports2024

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Provider Bias on Health in Youth and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Sara E Wetter-Wren, Alexandra C Himelhoch, Kimberly A Driscoll

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current diabetes reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improving equity in diabetes technology use: Voices of youth and their parents.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara E Wetter-WrenDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Alexandra C HimelhochDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Kimberly A DriscollDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, 1225 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. k.driscoll@phhp.ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3006-4633
University of Florida Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAlthough pervasive inequities in the health outcomes of youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) exist, the role of provider bias in these inequities is not well-understood. The purpose of this review is to synthesize evidence from existing studies on the associations between patient characteristics, provider bias, and patient health. RECENT

findingsFourteen articles were included. Determining the extent of the effects of provider bias on patient health is limited by a lack of consensus on its definition. Experiences of provider bias (e.g., shaming, criticism) negatively affects self-esteem, relationships with medical providers, and depressive symptoms. Provider bias also impacts diabetes technology recommendations, insulin regimen intensity, and risk for life-threatening T1D complications. Future studies are needed to develop questionnaires and interviews that better account for diverse experiences and interpretations of bias in T1D healthcare. More research is also needed to investigate mitigating factors to reduce provider bias as a way to improve psychological and physical health in individuals with T1D.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdolescentAdultHumansYoung AdultHealth OutcomesProvider BiasSystematic ReviewYoung AdultsYouth

Identifiers

PMID38233705
OpenAlexW4390972035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.