ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024
Does spatial resolution matter in the estimation of average annual soil loss by using RUSLE?-a study of the Urmodi River Watershed (Maharashtra), India.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigates the influence of multispectral satellite data's spatial resolution on land degradation in the Urmodi River Watershed in which Kaas Plateau, a UNESCO World Heritage site, is located. Specifically, the research focuses on soil erosion and its risk zonation. The study employs Landsat 8 (30-m resolution) and Sentinel-2 (10-m resolution) data to assess soil erosion risk. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) is used to quantify the average annual soil erosion output denoted by (A), by using its factors such as rainfall (R), soil erodibility (K), slope-length (LS), cover management (C), and support practices (P). R-factor was computed from MERRA-2 rainfall data, K-factor was derived from field soil sample-based analysis, LS factor was from Cartosat Digital Elevation Model-based data. The C factor was derived from NDVI of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, and the P factor was prepared from LULC derived from Landsat 8, and Sentinel-2 was incorporated in the final integration. The soil erosion hazard map ranged from slight to extremely severe. Remote sensing (RS)-based parameters like Land Use Land Cover (LULC) are derived from the Landsat 8 and Sentine-2 satellite data and used to compute the difference in the final outcome of the integration. The study found similarities in average annual soil loss (A) in plain areas, but differences in final soil erosion risk zone (A) were influenced by LULC map variations due to different cell sizes, P factor, and slope gradient. Notable differences were observed in soil erosion risk categories, particularly in high to very severe zones, with a cumulative difference of 73.85 km
Indexed as
Identifiers
38233696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.