ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces: identification, virulence factors, and antifungal susceptibility of a challenging rare yeast.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Cross-Domain Framework for the Dual Nature of Geotrichum and Magnusiomyces Across Plant, Food, and Clinical Systems.Current microbiology · 2026Review
- Antifungal susceptibility and in vitro virulence characteristics of clinical Magnusiomyces/Saprochaete isolates: a multicenter study from Türkiye.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Invasive Saprochaete capitata Infection in an Immunocompromised Patient With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces is among rare yeasts which might emerge as causes of breakthrough infections and nosocomial outbreaks. Identification to the species level might be a challenge in clinical laboratories. Data on virulence factors are scarce and antifungal susceptibility testing methodology is not definite. The aim of this study was to confirm species identification of clinical Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces isolates, find out their virulence factors, and obtain antifungal minimum inhibitory concentrations with two reference methods. Of the 57 isolates included, 54 were Saprochaete capitata and four were Saprochaete clavata as identified by ID32C, MALDI-TOF MS, and sequencing. When tested using phenotypic methods, all isolates were negative for coagulase, hemolysis, acid proteinase, and phospholipase, 56.1% were positive for esterase, and 19.3% had intermediate surface hydrophobicity. All isolates formed biofilms, with 40.4% of the isolates producing more biomass than biofilm-positive reference strain Candida albicans MYA-274. Antifungal susceptibility testing needed an adjusted spectrophotometric inoculum than recommended in reference methods for Candida/Cryptococcus. In conclusion, Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces species could be identified using methods available in the clinical laboratories. Despite the disadvantages of the phenotypic methods, esterase positivity was observed for the first time. A high biomass production was observed in biofilms. The need for standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing was brought to attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.