Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233631›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

What do we manipulate when reminding people of (not) having control? In search of construct validity.

Marcin Bukowski, Anna Potoczek, Krystian Barzykowski, Johannes Lautenbacher, Michael Inzlicht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcin BukowskiInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland. marcin.bukowski@uj.edu.pl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-4066
Anna PotoczekInterdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Krystian BarzykowskiInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.
Johannes LautenbacherDepartment of Social Psychology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael InzlichtDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG FR 2067/14-1Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej PPN/BEK/2020/1/00229/DEC/1Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/35/B/HS6/00528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construct of personal control is crucial for understanding a variety of human behaviors. Perceived lack of control affects performance and psychological well-being in diverse contexts - educational, organizational, clinical, and social. Thus, it is important to know to what extent we can rely on the established experimental manipulations of (lack of) control. In this article, we examine the construct validity of recall-based manipulations of control (or lack thereof). Using existing datasets (Study 1a and 1b: N = 627 and N = 454, respectively) we performed content-based analyses of control experiences induced by two different procedures (free recall and positive events recall). The results indicate low comparability between high and low control conditions in terms of the emotionality of a recalled event, the domain and sphere of control, amongst other differences. In an experimental study that included three types of recall-based control manipulations (Study 2: N = 506), we found that the conditions differed not only in emotionality but also in a generalized sense of control. This suggests that different aspects of personal control can be activated, and other constructs evoked, depending on the experimental procedure. We discuss potential sources of variability between control manipulation procedures and propose improvements in practices when using experimental manipulations of sense of control and other psychological constructs.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental RecallAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSelf-ControlYoung AdultConstruct validityPersonal controlRecall-based manipulationsReplicability

Identifiers

PMID38233631
PMCPMC11133203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.