Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233532›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2024

Modifications to the parasitological technique of Rugai increase the diagnostic sensitivity for strongyloidiasis.

João Gustavo Mendes Rodrigues, Guilherme Silva Miranda, Genil Mororó Araújo Camelo, Vanessa Fernandes Rodrigues, Jeferson Kelvin Alves Oliveira Silva, Caio Brandão Goes Gouveia, Wagnner José Nascimento Porto, Flaviana Santos Wanderley, Stefan Michael Geiger, Deborah Aparecida Negrão-Corrêa

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Gustavo Mendes RodriguesInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0920-4977
Guilherme Silva MirandaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-2776
Genil Mororó Araújo CameloInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0501-2508
Vanessa Fernandes RodriguesInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-4161
Jeferson Kelvin Alves Oliveira SilvaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-7578
Caio Brandão Goes GouveiaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9584-9489
Wagnner José Nascimento PortoInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2930-9760
Flaviana Santos WanderleyLaboratory of Parasitic Infectious Diseases, State University of Health Sciences of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6922-4174
Stefan Michael GeigerInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9741-2727
Deborah Aparecida Negrão-CorrêaInstitute of Biological Sciences, Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. denegrao@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-5216
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimeto Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq - Edital CNPq/MS-SCTIE-DECIT 442994/2019-2Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Alagoas - Edital PSUS EFP_00023144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strongyloidiasis is a neglected tropical disease caused mainly by Strongyloides stercoralis, a nematode that can persist for decades in the human host with a very low parasitic burden and without specific symptoms. Hence, it is difficult to diagnose and control. Larval concentration and culture methods with fecal samples show higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of Strongyloides-infected individuals; however, these techniques are not routinely used, primarily due to the challenges associated with processing a substantial volume of fecal samples. In the current study, we comparatively evaluated the sensitivity and applicability of modifications made to the Rugai parasitological method for the diagnosis of strongyloidiasis in fecal samples of experimentally infected rats and in 68 individuals from an urban community close to Maceió, Brazil. The presence and quantity of parasite larvae in the feces were comparatively evaluated using different parasitological techniques. In the experimental model, we demonstrated that the modified Rugai technique (RMOD) allowed for significantly higher recovery of larvae than the original Rugai technique (RO). Moreover, the sediment was cleaner and easier to evaluate using optical microscopy. Compared to other parasitological techniques, such as agar-plate culture (A-PC) and spontaneous sedimentation (SS), the RMOD technique showed higher sensitivity in the detection of larvae in all infected groups and presented comparatively better performance, especially in rats with a low parasite burden. In the human population, among the 68 stool samples evaluated, Strongyloides larvae were detected in the feces of six individuals with an estimated prevalence of 8.82%. However, the performance of each parasitological method was remarkably different. SS identified Strongyloides larvae in only two individuals and A-PC in three, whereas RMOD was able to identify six infected individuals, resulting in sensitivities of 33.3%, 50%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, the modifications introduced to the Rugai technique resulted in improved sensitivity for the detection of Strongyloides spp. infections, especially in stool samples with a low parasite burden, in comparison with other routinely used parasitological techniques.

Indexed as

Strongyloides stercoralisStrongyloidiasisAgarAnimalsFecesHumansLarvaRatsSensitivity and SpecificityAgarDiagnosisLow parasite burdenRugai ModifiedSensitivityStrongyloides

Identifiers

PMID38233532
OpenAlexW4390988543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.