Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233453›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Research on the influence of different sampling resolution and spatial resolution in sampling strategy on landslide susceptibility mapping results.

Xianyu Yu, Huihui Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xianyu YuSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, 430068, China. yuxianyu@hbut.edu.cn.
Huihui ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, 430068, China.
Hubei University of Technology · CN

Funding

Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes 2020EJB004National Natural Science Foundation of China 41807297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landslides, recognized as a significant global natural disaster, necessitate an exploration of the impact of various resolution types in sampling strategies on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) results. This study focuses on the segment from Zigui to Badong within the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, utilizing two resolution types: sampling resolution and spatial resolution, The Support Vector Machine (SVM) is employed to obtain LSM results, which are then analyzed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, specific category accuracy and statistical methods. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were used to verify the reliability of the results. Additionally, five common machine learning models, including Logistic Regression (LR), are used to conduct experiments on four sampling resolutions (10 m,30 m,50 m and 70 m) to further investigate the effect of sampling resolution on LSM results. These are evaluated using a comprehensive quantitative method. The results reveal that increasing spatial resolution improves the prediction accuracy, while increasing sampling resolution produces a contrary effect. Furthermore, the impact of spatial resolution on LSM results is more pronounced than that of sampling resolution. Finally, Fanjiaping landslide and Huangtupo landslide are selected as references for comparative analysis, with the results aligning with engineering reality.

Identifiers

PMID38233453
PMCPMC10794452
OpenAlexW4390980112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.