Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233004›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2024

Harlequin ichthyosis, prenatal diagnosis: the ultrasound recognition.

Ricardo Alfonso González, Andrea Veronica Ojeda, Nathalia Andrea Nova, Richard Jose Prasca

Erratum issuedAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Alfonso GonzálezMaternal Fetal Medicine Unit, El Bosque University Faculty of Medicine, Bogota, Colombia inricardogonzalez@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5615-1110
Andrea Veronica OjedaMaternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Universidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Nathalia Andrea NovaUniversidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Richard Jose PrascaUniversidad El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harlequin ichthyosis (HI) is an extremely rare disease with a prevalence of less than 1/300 000 live newborns and no more than 100 cases reported worldwide. It corresponds to a genodermatoses autosomal recessive inheritance, typically, with postnatal recognition due to the complexity of prenatal diagnosis. Advances in prenatal genetic testing allow sequencing of the affected gene and confirmation of the diagnosis after recognition of ultrasound markers. The prenatal acknowledgement of the disease significantly marks the course of the pregnancy; considering the perinatal high risk and neonatal mortality, this entity can be classified as lethal. Taking into account the legislation of each country, the possibility of pregnancy termination should be considered as an acceptable option. We present a case of prenatally diagnosed HI in the first ultrasound evaluation by the Maternal Fetal Medicine unit at 29 weeks of gestation, in which after counselling to the parents, the interruption of the gestation was decided.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedIchthyosis, LamellarFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonographyUltrasonography, PrenatalGenetic screening / counsellingPregnancyRadiology (diagnostics)

Identifiers

PMID38233004
PMCPMC10806978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.