ArticleBMJ global health2024
National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) exclusively for insulin: towards affordable access in China and beyond.
Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Impact of China's National Volume-Based Procurement Policy on Cost, Volume, and Market Structure: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Montelukast Sodium.Health care science · 2026Article
- Unintended consequences of National centralized volume-based drug procurement policy in China: a game theory-based analytical approach for pharmaceutical quality and pricing.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Drug price trends, regional disparities, and supply shortages under China's National Volume-Based Procurement: a nationwide analysis (2018-2024).BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Diagnosis-Related group payment and its impact on hospitalization costs and patient financial protection for neurointerventional stroke care in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a retrospective analysis.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Low opinion of generic oral anticancer drugs: an unacknowledged factor resulting in medication waste in China.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Article
- Impacts of national volume-based procurement policy on insulin price, volume and expenditure in China: a quasi-experimental study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Insulin-Related Consumables Should not be Ignored While Pooling Insulin Purchases: Experience From China.Health care science · 2025Article
- Impact of China's National Volume-Based Procurement policy exclusively for insulin on the volume, expenditure and price: an interrupted time series analysis in Guangdong Province.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Whether medicine supply is really meeting primary health care needs: a mixed-methods study in Shandong Province, China.Global health research and policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universal access to insulin remains a global public health challenge mainly due to its high price. After unsuccessful healthcare reforms attempting to lower insulin prices over the past several decades, the novel pooled procurement-also known as the national volume-based procurement (NVBP)was initiated exclusively for insulin in China. The NVBP exclusively for insulin represents a unique approach to conquering the challenges in the pooled procurement many low-income and middle-income countries face. In this paper, we described how the pooled procurement mechanism was implemented for insulin in China. Forty-two insulin products from 11 companies were procured, with a median price reduction of 42.08%. The procurement price ranged from US$0.35 to US$1.63 (¥2.35-¥10.97) per defined daily dose (DDD). The median procurement price per DDD was US$$0.54 (¥3.63) for human insulins and US$0.92 (¥6.18) for analogue insulin (p<0.001), respectively. A total of 32 000 medical facilities participated in the procurement, and the pooled demand for insulin was 1.61 billion daily doses, with an estimated saving of US$2.85 billion (¥19 billion) for the first year of the procurement agreement. Insulin affordability and accessibility improved substantially. This study reveals that the NVBP exclusively for insulin could effectively reduce insulin prices and improve access to this essential medicine. Even though the pooled procurement option looks efficient, its long-term impacts on the healthcare system should be closely monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.