ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024
"A successful reconstruction of remnants of corporal bodies and penile urethra after Total Glans Penis amputation following surgical circumcision in a 5-year-old boy". A case report and literature review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Total penile amputation following ritual circumcision: A case report of a devastating complication.Urology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceCircumcision is the most common surgical procedure done in boys. Its complication varies from minor to severe. In most of African countries circumcision is often performed by traditional circumcisers. The management of penile glans amputation depends on the duration before presentation with auto-transplantation being the favorable management in acute phase of presentation. The amputation of the glans is a serious complication of circumcision because it can derange the urinary and sexual functions of a patient and may lead into psychological instability and low self-esteem. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of total glansectomy in a 5-year old boy who presented 12 months after surgical circumcision which was done by inexperienced medical personnel at his house. Patient presented with a pinhole urethra opening, missing glans, buried phallus with remnants of corporal bodies. Penile exploration was done, with successful significant phallus stump of about 5 cm, phallus reconstruction and meatoplasty was achieved. Partial Skin thickness grafting of the phallus stump was performed. At six- month follow up, the patient had both satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Total glansectomy is a rare surgical emergency with auto transplantation being the best option in acute management however successful outcome for a delayed glansectomy depends on proficient surgical penile exploration and comprehensive post operative care. Based on the clinical presentation, the goals of management for our patient were to achieve a largely patent urethral opening in the long term and to prevent further urethral meatal stenosis as well as achieving adequate phallus stump for sexual function.
conclusionThe amputation of the glans is a serious complication of circumcision because it can derange the urinary and sexual functions of a patient if neglected. Findings on this case report highlight the importance of raising awareness among traditional health care workers to prevent urinary and sexual function disabilities. Prevention of penile amputation can be prevented by providing proper training for circumcisers and providing public education for hospital circumcision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.