ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2024
In vitro characterization of a novel resin-based restorative material containing alkaline fillers.
Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cuspal displacement, marginal adaptation, and nanoleakage in maxillary premolars restored with a novel auto-cured bulk-fill composite versus a light-cured bulk-fill composite: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Adhesive Performance of Ion-Releasing Materials on Dentin with Altered Mineralization.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- An in vitro comparison of color stability between alkasite and different restorative materials in various staining solutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance of an alkasite restorative material under acidic conditions: surface roughness, gloss and hardness.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Topical Fluoride Application Temperature on Recharge and Rerelease in Different Restorative Materials.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Surface roughness and biofilm formation on tooth-colored restorative materials immersed in food-simulating liquids.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Gastric acid challenge: Mechanical proficiency and surface gloss of tooth-colored restorative materials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Surface properties of direct restorations and adjacent dental tissues after saliva exposure.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Mechanical Properties of Alkasite Material with Different Curing Modes and Simulated Aging Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, a comparative evaluation of the physicochemical properties of Cention N and other direct restorative materials was performed. Three restorative materials-a resin-modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), an alkasite-based resinous material (Cention N), and a resin composite (Tetric N Ceram)-were characterized in terms of degree of conversion, Knoop hardness number (KHN) ratio, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water sorption, water solubility, microshear bond strength to dentin, immediate microleakage, and radiopacity. METHODOLOGY: The microshear bond strength to dentin and microleakage of Cention N were evaluated with and without the application of an adhesive system (Tetric N Bond Universal). A one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data in terms of degree of conversion, KHN ratio, water sorption, water solubility, microshear bond strength to dentin, and radiopacity. A two-way ANOVA test (carried out considering the material type and ethanol aging as factors) was used to analyze the data in terms of flexural strength and elastic modulus. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to statistically analyze the data on microleakage. A significance level of α=0.05 was used for all tests.
resultsFuji II LC was found to have the highest degree of conversion, water sorption, and microleakage, as well as the lowest flexural strength. Cention N had the highest solubility; when used with an adhesive system, it achieved bond strength and microleakage similar to those of the Tetric N Ceram composite. Tetric N Ceram had the highest degree of conversion, KHN ratio, and radiopacity. Conclusion: The properties of Cention N validate its efficacy as an alternative direct restorative material when used in conjunction with an adhesive system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.