Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38232169›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Predicting success in Cu-catalyzed C-N coupling reactions using data science.

Mohammad H Samha, Lucas J Karas, David B Vogt, Emmanuel C Odogwu, Jennifer Elward, Jennifer M Crawford, Janelle E Steves, Matthew S Sigman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Base-Free C-N Cross-Electrophile Coupling.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frugal Sampling Strategies for Navigating Complex Reaction Spaces.Organic process research & development · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Considerations in Pursuing Reaction Scope Generality.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad H SamhaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1255-0582
Lucas J KarasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7970-119X
David B VogtDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Emmanuel C OdogwuDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-0414-9879
Jennifer ElwardMolecular Design, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 S. Collegeville Rd., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-3411
Jennifer M CrawfordDrug Substance Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 S. Collegeville Rd., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2936-4038
Janelle E StevesDrug Substance Development, GlaxoSmithKline, 1250 S. Collegeville Rd., Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-7556
Matthew S SigmanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 S. 1400 E., Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5746-8830

Funding

Data Science Guided Organic Reaction DevelopmentR35GM136271 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MATTHEW S SIGMAN · 2020 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data science is assuming a pivotal role in guiding reaction optimization and streamlining experimental workloads in the evolving landscape of synthetic chemistry. A discipline-wide goal is the development of workflows that integrate computational chemistry and data science tools with high-throughput experimentation as it provides experimentalists the ability to maximize success in expensive synthetic campaigns. Here, we report an end-to-end data-driven process to effectively predict how structural features of coupling partners and ligands affect Cu-catalyzed C-N coupling reactions. The established workflow underscores the limitations posed by substrates and ligands while also providing a systematic ligand prediction tool that uses probability to assess when a ligand will be successful. This platform is strategically designed to confront the intrinsic unpredictability frequently encountered in synthetic reaction deployment.

Identifiers

PMID38232169
PMCPMC10793951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.