Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38232123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Rhesus monkeys learn to control a directional-key inspired brain machine interface via bio-feedback.

Chenguang Zhang, Hao Wang, Shaohua Tang, Zheng Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chenguang ZhangCenter for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-4491
Hao WangInstitute of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Shaohua TangCenter for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5258-558X
Zheng LiCenter for Cognition and Neuroergonomics, State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University at Zhuhai, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9165-6878
Beijing Normal University · CNChina Telecom (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain machine interfaces (BMI) connect brains directly to the outside world, bypassing natural neural systems and actuators. Neuronal-activity-to-motion transformation algorithms allow applications such as control of prosthetics or computer cursors. These algorithms lie within a spectrum between bio-mimetic control and bio-feedback control. The bio-mimetic approach relies on increasingly complex algorithms to decode neural activity by mimicking the natural neural system and actuator relationship while focusing on machine learning: the supervised fitting of decoder parameters. On the other hand, the bio-feedback approach uses simple algorithms and relies primarily on user learning, which may take some time, but can facilitate control of novel, non-biological appendages. An increasing amount of work has focused on the arguably more successful bio-mimetic approach. However, as chronic recordings have become more accessible and utilization of novel appendages such as computer cursors have become more universal, users can more easily spend time learning in a bio-feedback control paradigm. We believe a simple approach which leverages user learning and few assumptions will provide users with good control ability. To test the feasibility of this idea, we implemented a simple firing-rate-to-motion correspondence rule, assigned groups of neurons to virtual "directional keys" for control of a 2D cursor. Though not strictly required, to facilitate initial control, we selected neurons with similar preferred directions for each group. The groups of neurons were kept the same across multiple recording sessions to allow learning. Two Rhesus monkeys used this BMI to perform a center-out cursor movement task. After about a week of training, monkeys performed the task better and neuronal signal patterns changed on a group basis, indicating learning. While our experiments did not compare this bio-feedback BMI to bio-mimetic BMIs, the results demonstrate the feasibility of our control paradigm and paves the way for further research in multi-dimensional bio-feedback BMIs.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAlgorithmsAnimalsBiofeedback, PsychologyBrainFeedbackMacaca mulattaUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID38232123
PMCPMC10793883
OpenAlexW4390938735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.