ArticlePloS one2024
An in silico procedure for generating protein-mediated chromatin interaction data and comparison of significant interaction calling methods.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to simulate high-throughput data with high fidelity to real experimental data is fundamental for benchmarking methods used to detect true long-range chromatin interactions mediated by a specific protein. Yet, such tools are not currently available. To fill this gap, we develop an in silico experimental procedure, ChIA-Sim, which imitates the experimental procedures that produce real ChIA-PET, Hi-ChIP, or PLAC-seq data. We show the fidelity of ChIA-Sim to real data by using guiding characteristics of several real datasets to generate data using the simulation procedure. We also used ChIA-Sim data to demonstrate the use of our in silico procedure in benchmarking methods for significant interactions analysis by evaluating four methods for significant interaction calling (SIC). In particular, we assessed each method's performance in terms of correct identification of long-range interactions. We further analyzed four experimental datasets from publicly available databases and shew that the trend of the results are consistent with those seen in data generated from ChIA-Sim. This serves as additional evidence that ChIA-Sim closely resembles data produced from the experimental protocols it models after.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.