Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38232083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Enacting inclusive science: Culturally responsive higher education practices in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM).

Krystle P Cobian, Sylvia Hurtado, Ana L Romero, Justin A Gutzwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Krystle P CobianDepartment of General Internal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-7573
Sylvia HurtadoDepartment of Education, School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ana L RomeroDepartment of Education, School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1973-6635
Justin A GutzwaDepartment of Educational Administration, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

NIH Diversity Program Consortium Coordination and Evaluation Center at UCLAU54GM119024 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NORRIS, KEITH C, SEEMAN, TERESA E · 2015 to 2023
$38.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM119024NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM119024– 03:S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel approaches in higher education are needed to reverse underrepresentation of racial/ethnic groups in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM). Building on theoretical frameworks for practice in diverse learning environments, this study provides evidence for Inclusive Science as a conceptual model that reflects initiatives intended to diversify biomedical research training for undergraduates. Using multiple case study design and cross-case analysis, we analyzed data from 10 higher education sites that were awarded the Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity (BUILD) grant funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We identified the following dimensions of the Inclusive Science model: promoting participation of diverse researchers; introducing diversity innovations in science and research curriculum; improving campus climate for diversity; providing tangible institutional support; creating partnerships with diverse communities; and integrating students' social identities with science identity. We illustrate each dimension of the model with examples of campus practices across BUILD sites. While many may doubt that science can be responsive to diversity, the interventions developed by these campuses illustrate how colleges and universities can actively engage in culturally responsive practices in STEMM undergraduate training that integrate trainees' identities, knowledge of diverse communities, and create a greater awareness of the climate for diversity that affects student training and outcomes. Implications include culturally responsive strategies that many more higher education institutions can employ to support scientific career training for historically excluded groups.

Indexed as

EngineeringTechnologyCurriculumHumansLearningMathematics

Identifiers

PMID38232083
PMCPMC10793921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.