Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38232033›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

How to Make the Stress Relaxation Experiment for Polymers More Informative.

Anna Stankiewicz, Sławomir Juściński

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna StankiewiczDepartment of Technology Fundamentals, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0715-7225
Sławomir JuścińskiDepartment of Power Engineering and Transportation, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-9083
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different viscoelastic models and characteristics are commonly used to describe, analyze, compare and improve the mechanical properties of polymers. A time-dependent linear relaxation modulus next to frequency-domain storage and loss moduli are the basic rheological material functions of polymers. The exponential Maxwell model and the exponential stretched Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts model are, probably, the most known linear rheological models of polymers. There are different identification methods for such models, some of which are dedicated to specific models, while others are general in nature. However, the identification result, i.e., the best model, always depends on the specific experimental data on the basis of which it was determined. When the rheological stress relaxation test is performed, the data are composed of the sampling instants used in the test and on the measurements of the relaxation modulus of the real material. To build a relaxation modulus model that does not depend on sampling instants is a fundamental concern. The problem of weighted least-squares approximation of the real relaxation modulus is discussed when only the noise-corrupted time-measurements of the relaxation modulus are accessible for identification. A wide class of models, that are continuous, differentiable and Lipschitz with respect to parameters, is considered for the relaxation modulus approximation. The main results concern the models that are selected asymptotically as the number of measurements tends to infinity. It is shown that even when the true relaxation modulus description is completely unknown, the approximate optimal model parameters can be derived from the measurement data that are obtained for sampling instants that are selected randomly due to the appropriate randomization introduced whenever certain conditions regarding the adopted class of models are satisfied. It is shown that the most commonly used stress relaxation models, the Maxwell and Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts models, satisfy these conditions. Since the practical problems of the identification of relaxation modulus models are usually ill posed, Tikhonov regularization is applied to guarantee the stability of the regularized solutions. The approximate optimal model is a strongly consistent estimate of the regularized model that is optimal in the sense of the deterministic integral weighted square error. An identification algorithm leading to the best regularized model is presented. The stochastic-type convergence analysis is conducted for noise-corrupted relaxation modulus measurements, and the exponential convergence rate is proved. Numerical studies for different models of the relaxation modulus used in the polymer rheology are presented for the material described by a bimodal Gauss-like relaxation spectrum. Numerical studies have shown that if appropriate randomization is introduced in the selection of sampling instants, then optimal regularized models of the relaxation modulus being asymptotically independent of these time instants can be recovered from the stress relaxation experiment data. The robustness of the identification algorithm to measurement noises was demonstrated both by analytical and numerical analyses.

Indexed as

differentiable Lipchitz modelsexperiment randomizationlinear relaxation modulusstress relaxation testviscoelasticity of polymers

Identifiers

PMID38232033
PMCPMC10708415
OpenAlexW4389264261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.