Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231993›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

A Comparative Study of Resistant Dextrins and Resistant Maltodextrins from Different Tuber Crop Starches.

Xinyang Chen, Yinchen Hou, Zhen Wang, Aimei Liao, Long Pan, Mingyi Zhang, Yingchun Xue, Jingjing Wang, Yingying Liu, Jihong Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Synthesis of Jicama (Polymers · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xinyang ChenHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yinchen HouSchool of Food and Bioengineering, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China.
Zhen WangState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, College of Agriculture, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Aimei LiaoHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Long PanHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Mingyi ZhangHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yingchun XueHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jingjing WangHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yingying LiuHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jihong HuangHenan Key Laboratory of Wheat Bioprocessing and Nutritional Function, School of Biological Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Henan University of Technology · CNHenan University · CNHenan University of Economic and Law · CN

Funding

Central Government Guides the Local Science and Technology Development Special Fund Z20221341069Henan Provincial Key Science&Technology Special Project 232102111060Key Research and Development Project of Henan Province 231111310700Major Science and Technology Projects for Public Welfare of Henan Province 201300110300Zhongyuan Scholars of Henan Province in China 192101510004Zhongyuan Scholar Workstation Funded Project ZYGZZ2021056,224400510026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anti-digestibility of resistant dextrin (RD) and resistant maltodextrin (RMD) is usually significantly affected by processing techniques, reaction conditions, and starch sources. The objective of this investigation is to elucidate the similarities and differences in the anti-digestive properties of RD and RMD prepared from three different tuber crop starches, namely, potato, cassava, and sweet potato, and to reveal the associated mechanisms. The results show that all RMDs have a microstructure characterized by irregular fragmentation and porous surfaces, no longer maintaining the original crystalline structure of starches. Conversely, RDs preserve the structural morphology of starches, featuring rough surfaces and similar crystalline structures. RDs exhibite hydrolysis rates of approximately 40%, whereas RMDs displaye rates lower than 8%. This disparity can be attributed to the reduction of α-1,4 and α-1,6 bonds and the development of a highly branched spatial structure in RMDs. The indigestible components of the three types of RDs range from 34% to 37%, whereas RMDs vary from 80% to 85%, with potato resistant maltodextrin displaying the highest content (84.96%,

Indexed as

in vitro digestibilityresistant dextrinsresistant maltodextrinsstructure characterizationthermal-acid treatment

Identifiers

PMID38231993
PMCPMC10708145
OpenAlexW4389057149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.