ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2024
Multi-Task Learning for Motion Analysis and Segmentation in 3D Echocardiography.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Utilizing multimodal artificial intelligence to advance cardiovascular diseases.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Echo-ODE: A dynamics modeling network with neural ODE for temporally consistent segmentation of video echocardiograms.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation Framework for Unsupervised Registration.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Characterizing left ventricular deformation and strain using 3D+time echocardiography provides useful insights into cardiac function and can be used to detect and localize myocardial injury. To achieve this, it is imperative to obtain accurate motion estimates of the left ventricle. In many strain analysis pipelines, this step is often accompanied by a separate segmentation step; however, recent works have shown both tasks to be highly related and can be complementary when optimized jointly. In this work, we present a multi-task learning network that can simultaneously segment the left ventricle and track its motion between multiple time frames. Two task-specific networks are trained using a composite loss function. Cross-stitch units combine the activations of these networks by learning shared representations between the tasks at different levels. We also propose a novel shape-consistency unit that encourages motion propagated segmentations to match directly predicted segmentations. Using a combined synthetic and in-vivo 3D echocardiography dataset, we demonstrate that our proposed model can achieve excellent estimates of left ventricular motion displacement and myocardial segmentation. Additionally, we observe strong correlation of our image-based strain measurements with crystal-based strain measurements as well as good correspondence with SPECT perfusion mappings. Finally, we demonstrate the clinical utility of the segmentation masks in estimating ejection fraction and sphericity indices that correspond well with benchmark measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.