ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Impact of optical navigation variables on the accuracy of robot-assisted surgery: a study of the TIANJI Robot system.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to explore factors related to optical navigation that interfere with the accuracy of robot-assisted surgery, specifically focusing on the TIANJI Robot system. A measurement model was created to assess the accuracy of the TIANJI Robot system in simulated screw placement. Deviation between actual and planned positions was measured using a three-coordinate machine. Various experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of different optical navigation factors on screw placement accuracy. Deviations were measured at different distances (ranging from 1.2 to 2.2 m) between the optical navigation stereo camera and the tracker, with each distance being tested 50 times. The distance between the optical camera and patient tracker was set at 1.4 m. Deviations were also measured at different angles between the camera and robot tracker, repeated over 25 times for each angle. Data were analyzed using mean and standard deviation, with line charts illustrating deviation changes based on distance and angle details. Within the range of the TIANJI Robot system's optical navigation (1.2-2.2 m), deviation increased as distance increased (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
38231441What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.