ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024
Incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in Japan (the MSUG94 group).
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visceral Fat Volume and Inguinal Hernia After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Three-Dimensional CT Analysis.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026Article
- Outcomes and evolving surgical trends in inguinal hernia repair following prior urologic surgery: a 15-year single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor: interpretable machine learning model predicts 1‑year inguinal hernia risk after robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Comment on: "Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the incidence and risk factors of inguinal hernia (IH) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using a multicentric database. The present study used a multicentric database (the MSUG94) containing data on 3,195 Japanese patients undergoing RARP between 2012 and 2021. Surgical procedures utilized for IH prevention were as follows: isolation of the vas deferens, transection of the vas deferens, isolation of the spermatic vessels, and separation of the peritoneum from the internal inguinal ring. The primary and secondary endpoints were IH-free survival and any association between post-RARP IH and clinical covariates. The prophylactic effect of the above procedures were also assessed. IH prevention was attempted in 1,465 (46.4%) patients at five of the nine hospitals. During follow-up (median 24 months), post-RARP IH developed in 243 patients. The post-RARP IH-free survival rates at years 1, 2, and 3 were 94.3%, 91.7%, and 90.5%, respectively. Old age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.037; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.014-1.061; p = 0.001), low BMI (HR 0.904; 95% CI 0.863-0.946: p < 0.001), and low hospital volume (HR 1.385; 95% CI 1.003-1.902; p = 0.048) were independently associated with IH development. None of the procedures for IH prevention were associated with IH development. Our findings may represent the current, real-world status of post-RARP IH in Japan. The prophylactic effects of the surgical procedures for IH prevention should be further investigated in well-designed, prospective studies to optimize the surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38231428What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.