Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231343›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Clinical evaluation of a patient participation assessment system for upper extremity rehabilitation exercises.

Erkan Ödemiş, Cabbar Veysel Baysal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erkan ÖdemişDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Çukurova University, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey. eodemis@cu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-4288
Cabbar Veysel BaysalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Çukurova University, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey.
Cukurova University · TR

Funding

Çukurova Üniversitesi FDK-2019-12074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In conventional and robotic rehabilitation, the patient's active participation in exercises is essential for the maximum functional output to be received from therapy. In rehabilitation exercises performed with robotic devices, the difficulty levels of therapy tasks and the device assistance are adjusted based on the patient's therapy performance to improve active participation. However, the existing therapy performance evaluation methods are based on either some specific device designs or certain therapy tasks, which limits their widespread use. In this paper, the effectiveness of a participation assessment system, which can evaluate patients' therapy performance, tiredness, and slacking independent of any device design and therapy exercise, was clinically tested on ten patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder syndrome. The patients performed exercises using the system once a week throughout their 4-week treatment period. Multiple clinical measurements and scales were employed during the clinical study to assess patients' progress and status, such as tiredness throughout the therapy process. The clinical data, along with the patient findings obtained from the participation assessment system, were statistically analyzed and compared. The findings revealed that the patients' improvements and progress during the therapy process clinically coincide with the variations in the performance evaluation results of the system, and the implemented method successfully assesses the patients' participation during the rehabilitation exercises.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyPatient ParticipationExerciseHumansRecovery of FunctionUpper ExtremityClinical trialFrozen shoulder syndromeParticipation assessmentPhysiological responsesRehabilitation exercises

Identifiers

PMID38231343
PMCPMC11021326
OpenAlexW4390952767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.