Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231309›Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024

Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery.

Vipul Patel, Shady Saikali, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Ela Patel, Richard Satava, Prokar Dasgupta, Mischa Dohler, Justin W Collins, David Albala, Jacques Marescaux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
52.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Feasibility and Initial Outcomes of Telesurgery in Urology: a Systematic Review of the Literature.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Global Adoption of Transcontinental Telesurgery: Are We There Yet?International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Vipul PatelAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
Shady SaikaliAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA. shadysaikali@gmail.com.
Marcio Covas MoschovasAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA.
Ela PatelStanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Richard SatavaUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Prokar DasguptaMRC Centre for Transplantation, Department of Urology, King's Health Partners, King's College London, London, UK.
Mischa DohlerAdvanced Technology Group, Ericsson Inc., Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA.
Justin W CollinsDivision of Uro-Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
David AlbalaDownstate Health Sciences University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Jacques MarescauxIRCAD, Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France.
AdventHealth Celebration · USCMR Surgical (United Kingdom) · GBCrouse Hospital · USEricsson (United States) · USInstitut de Recherche contre les Cancers de l’Appareil Digestif · FRKing's College London · GBStanford University · USUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telesurgery, a cutting-edge field at the intersection of medicine and technology, holds immense promise for enhancing surgical capabilities, extending medical care, and improving patient outcomes. In this scenario, this article explores the landscape of technical and ethical considerations that highlight the advancement and adoption of telesurgery. Network considerations are crucial for ensuring seamless and low-latency communication between remote surgeons and robotic systems, while technical challenges encompass system reliability, latency reduction, and the integration of emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and 5G networks. Therefore, this article also explores the critical role of network infrastructure, highlighting the necessity for low-latency, high-bandwidth, secure and private connections to ensure patient safety and surgical precision. Moreover, ethical considerations in telesurgery include patient consent, data security, and the potential for remote surgical interventions to distance surgeons from their patients. Legal and regulatory frameworks require refinement to accommodate the unique aspects of telesurgery, including liability, licensure, and reimbursement. Our article presents a comprehensive analysis of the current state of telesurgery technology and its potential while critically examining the challenges that must be navigated for its widespread adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRobotic Surgical ProceduresCommunicationHumansPatient SafetyReproducibility of Results5GEthicalLatencyNetwork structureRemote surgeryRobotic surgeryTechnicalTelesurgery

Identifiers

PMID38231309
OpenAlexW4390946273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.