Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231271›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology2024

Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

Piero Barbanti, Cinzia Aurilia, Gabriella Egeo, Stefania Proietti, Florindo D'Onofrio, Paola Torelli, Marco Aguggia, Davide Bertuzzo, Cinzia Finocchi, Michele Trimboli and 19 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The second interim analysis of Italian participants enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, Phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Piero BarbantiHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy. piero.barbanti@sanraffaele.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-3755
Cinzia AuriliaHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy. cinzia.aurilia@sanraffaele.it.
Gabriella EgeoHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Stefania ProiettiClinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy.
Florindo D'OnofrioHeadache Center Neurology Unit, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy.
Paola TorelliUnit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Headache Center, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Marco AguggiaHeadache Center Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy.
Davide BertuzzoHeadache Center Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy.
Cinzia FinocchiDivisione di Neurologia, Ospedale San Paolo, ASL 2 Savonese, Savona, Italy.
Michele TrimboliUniversity Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Sabina CevoliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia FiorentiniHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Bianca OrlandoHeadache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Via Della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio ZuccoHeadache Center, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Laura Di ClementeHeadache Center, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria CettaNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Bruno ColomboNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Monica Laura Bandettini di PoggioIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Valentina FavoniIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Licia GrazziNeuroalgology Unit, Headache Center Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico"Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy.
Antonio SalernoHeadache Center San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonio CarnevaleHeadache Center San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Micaela RobottiHeadache Center, ASST Santi Paolo Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Fabio FredianiHeadache Center, ASST Santi Paolo Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Claudia AltamuraHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Massimo FilippiNeurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio VernieriHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Stefano BonassiSan Raffaele University, Rome, Italy.
ERT; for the Italian Migraine Registry study group
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITOspedale San Carlo · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITAzienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITMagna Graecia University · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNearly 60% of migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway experience a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at 12 weeks compared to baseline (responders). However, approximately half of the patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 12 weeks do respond ≤ 24 weeks (late responders). We assessed frequency and characteristics of patients responding to anti-CGRP mAbs only > 24 weeks (ultra-late responders).

methodsIn this multicenter (n = 16), prospective, observational, real-life study, we enrolled all consecutive adults affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM), with ≥ 3 prior therapeutic failures, treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 48 weeks. We defined responders patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 12 weeks, late responders those with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 24 weeks, and ultra-late responders those achieving a ≥ 50% response only > 24 weeks.

resultsA total of 572 migraine patients completed ≥ 48 weeks of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Responders accounted for 60.5% (346/572), late responders for 15% (86/572), and ultra-late responders for 15.7% (90/572). Among ultra-late responders, 7.3% (42/572) maintained the ≥ 50% response rate across all subsequent time intervals (weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) and were considered persistent ultra-late responders, while 8.4% (48/572) missed the ≥ 50% response rate at ≥ 1 subsequent time interval and were classified as fluctuating ultra-late responders. Fifty patients (8.7%) did not respond at any time interval ≤ 48 weeks. Ultra-late responders differed from responders for higher BMI (p = 0.033), longer duration of medication overuse (p < 0.001), lower NRS (p = 0.017) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.002), higher frequency of dopaminergic symptoms (p = 0.002), less common unilateral pain-either alone (p = 0.010) or in combination with UAS (p = 0.023), allodynia (p = 0.043), or UAS and allodynia (p = 0.012)-a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.012), psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.010) and a higher proportion of patients with ≥ 1 comorbidity (p = 0.020).

conclusionTwo-thirds of patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 24 weeks do respond later, while non-responders ≤ 48 weeks are quite rare (8.7%). These findings suggest to rethink the duration of migraine prophylaxis and the definition of resistant and refractory migraine, currently based on the response after 2-3 months of treatment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAnti-CGRP mAbsLate responseMigraineReal-lifeResponderTreatmentUltra-late response

Identifiers

PMID38231271
PMCPMC11055785
OpenAlexW4390944115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.