Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231265›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Pioneering gut health improvements in piglets with phytogenic feed additives.

Sung Joon Yu, Andrew Morris, Advait Kayal, Ivan Milošević, Thi Thu Hao Van, Yadav Sharma Bajagai, Dragana Stanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effect ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sung Joon YuCentral Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct (CQIRP), Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-5007
Andrew MorrisRiverbend Pork Group, 487-489 Ruthven Street, Toowoomba, 4350, Australia.
Advait KayalCentral Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct (CQIRP), Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-1516
Ivan MiloševićFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Oslobodjenja 18, 11999, Belgrade, Serbia.
Thi Thu Hao VanCentral Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct (CQIRP), Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.
Yadav Sharma BajagaiCentral Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct (CQIRP), Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-071X
Dragana StanleyCentral Queensland Innovation and Research Precinct (CQIRP), Institute for Future Farming Systems, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia. D.Stanley@cqu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7019-4726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigates the effects of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) on the growth performance, gut microbial community, and microbial metabolic functions in weaned piglets via a combined 16S rRNA gene amplicon and shotgun metagenomics approach. A controlled trial was conducted using 200 pigs to highlight the significant influence of PFAs on gut microbiota dynamics. Notably, the treatment group revealed an increased gut microbiota diversity, as measured with the Shannon and Simpson indices. The increase in diversity is accompanied by an increase in beneficial bacterial taxa, such as Roseburia, Faecalibacterium, and Prevotella, and a decline in potential pathogens like Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and Campylobacter. Shotgun sequencing at the species level confirmed these findings. This modification in microbial profile was coupled with an altered profile of microbial metabolic pathways, suggesting a reconfiguration of microbial function under PFA influence. Significant shifts in overall microbial community structure by week 8 demonstrate PFA treatment's temporal impact. Histomorphological examination unveiled improved gut structure in PFA-treated piglets. The results of this study indicate that the use of PFAs as dietary supplements can be an effective strategy, augmenting gut microbiota diversity, reshaping microbial function, enhancing gut structure, and optimising intestinal health of weaned piglets providing valuable implications for swine production. KEY POINTS: • PFAs significantly diversify the gut microbiota in weaned piglets, aiding balance. • Changes in gut structure due to PFAs indicate improved resistance to weaning stress. • PFAs show potential to ease weaning stress, offering a substitute for antibiotics in piglet diets.

Indexed as

FluorocarbonsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluorocarbonsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntibiotic alternativesGut microbiotaIntestinal morphologyMetabolic pathwaysMetagenomicsPhytogenic feed additives

Identifiers

PMID38231265
PMCPMC10794284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.