Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38231205›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Therapeutic approaches of diametaphyseal radius fractures in children.

D Stark, M Denzinger, L Ebert, R Brandl, C Knorr

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conservative management of 900 pediatric distal radius fractures using the schede cast: a multicenter study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D StarkKlinik für Kinderchirurgie, Klinik St. Hedwig, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93047, Regensburg, Germany. Domitille.Stark@barmherzige-regensburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-7455
M DenzingerKlinik für Kinderchirurgie, Klinik St. Hedwig, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
L EbertKlinik für Kinderchirurgie, Klinik St. Hedwig, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
R BrandlKlinik für Radiologie, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
C KnorrKlinik für Kinderchirurgie, Klinik St. Hedwig, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Steinmetzstr. 1-3, 93047, Regensburg, Germany.
St. Hedwig-Krankenhaus · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are clear standards for when to operate on both distal epiphyseal and diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. However, paediatric surgeons are often faced with fractures in the transition zone between metaphysis and diaphysis. This aim of the study is to compare different treatment approaches for diametaphyseal forearm fractures, to classify different types of these fractures, and to define further assessment parameters and treatment recommendations.

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients with diametaphyseal radial fractures who were seen at a paediatric surgery clinic between 01.01.2010 and 31.12.2013. Patients were treated either non-surgically (C) or surgically using bicortical Kirschner wire (BC-KW), intramedullary K-wire (IM-KW), elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN), or combined bicortical and intramedullary K-wire (BCIM-KW).

resultsDuring the study period, 547 patients presented with forearm fractures of which 88 patients (16%) had a fracture in the diametaphyseal region. The majority of diametaphyseal fractures were greenstick fractures (54.4%) followed by transverse fractures (44.3%). Distal fractures were predominantly treated with bicortical K-wiring (BC-KW, 40.5%) or non-surgically (C, 26.2%). Proximal fractures were treated by ESIN osteosynthesis (50%), followed by IM-KW (30%). Intermediate fractures were just as likely to be treated with one out of the 5 above-mentioned techniques. The ulna was involved in 64 of 88 cases. Depending on the type of fracture, it was treated either by ESIN osteosynthesis or non-surgically. No superior operative technique was identified.

conclusionsThe description of diametaphyseal fractures as a separate entity is important, because the therapy of these fractures is heterogeneous and challenging. A classification into proximal, intermediate, and distal may be useful in clinical decision-making. Despite the retrospective nature of this study, our data suggest that the use of a K-wire or combined technique BCIM-KW-technique, whenever technically feasible, achieves better radiological results without secondary dislocation. Further prospective studies are needed to provide better guidance to trauma surgeons.

Indexed as

Forearm InjuriesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryRadius FracturesBone NailsChildFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRadiusRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBicorticalDiametaphysisESINForearmIntramedullaryKirschner wirePediatric trauma

Identifiers

PMID38231205
OpenAlexW4390950010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.