Trial reportBlood advances2024
Prednisone vs high-dose dexamethasone in newly diagnosed adult primary immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized trial.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00657410 (Randomized Study of the Treatment of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Study of the Treatment of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) in Newly Diagnosed Untreated Adult Patients. Comparison of Standard Dose Prednisone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary Evans Syndrome Associated with Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of treating NELL1-positive idiopathic membranous nephropathy on clinical outcomes, serum cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-10, IL-2, IL-17), nutritional status, and immune responses.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
- Rilzabrutinib for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia.European journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Platelet response following dexamethasone in obese vs nonobese patients with primary, acute immune-mediated thrombocytopenia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- When is the use of intravenous immunoglobulin appropriate in immune thrombocytopenia?British journal of haematology · 2024Article
- The Many Faces of Immune Thrombocytopenia: Mechanisms, Therapies, and Clinical Challenges in Oncological Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Management of Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: Delphi-Based Consensus RecommendationsTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractA debate exists regarding which type of corticosteroids (standard-dose prednisone [PDN] or high-dose dexamethasone [HD-DXM]) is the best first-line treatment for adult patients with newly diagnosed untreated primary immune thrombocytopenia (pITP). An ad hoc study compared PDN with HD-DXM in newly diagnosed untreated patients with pITP (aged ≥18 but ≤80 years, platelet count of ≤20 or >20 but <50 × 109/L, and bleeding score of ≥8). Patients were randomised to receive PDN 1 mg/kg per day from days 0 to 28 (Arm A) or HD-DXM 40 mg per day for 4 days, every 14 days, for 3 consecutive courses (Arm B). Fifty-nine of 113 patients (52.2%) were randomized to Arm A and 54 of 113 (47.8%) to Arm B. In evaluable patients, total initial responses (complete response [CR], partial response [PR], minimal response [MR]) were 44 of 56 (78.57%) in Arm A and 46 of 49 (93.88%) in Arm B at days 42 and 46, respectively (P = 0.0284). Total final responses (at day 180 from initial response) were 26 of 43 (60.47%) in Arm A and 23 of 39 (58.97%) in Arm B (P = 0.8907). Total persistent responses (at 12 months from initial response) were 25 of 31 (80.65%) in Arm A and 20 of 36 (55.56%) in Arm B (P = 0.0292). Seven relapses occurred. Median follow-up was 44.4 months. Overall survival was 100% at 48 months, overall disease-free survival was 81.11% at 48 months from day 180. PDN and pulsed HD-DXM were well tolerated; HD-DXM allows effective initial responses but less long lasting than PDN. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00657410.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.