ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2024
Estimates of Current Capacity for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease in Sweden and the Need to Expand Specialist Numbers.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening 1021 Swedish memory clinic visitors for autoantibody-mediated encephalitis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Screening for Alzheimer's disease in the community using an AI-driven screening platform: design of the PREDICTOM study.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- The role of general practitioners in dementia diagnosis: a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines.Family practice · 2025Article
- Real-world lecanemab adoption in Japan 1 year after launch: Insights from 311 specialists on infrastructure and reimbursement barriers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Estimation of the value-based price of a blood test for Alzheimer's disease pathology in primary and specialty care in the U.S.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Global Diseases Deserve Global Solutions: Alzheimer's Disease.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Patient management pathways in dementia - Resource utilisation, diagnosis and drug treatment in the Stockholm region, Sweden.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Observational
- Temporal trends in sex differences in dementia care-results from the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders, SveDem.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Point of view: Challenges in implementation of new immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Global burden of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias attributable to smoking in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2021.PloS one · 2025Article
- Paving the way for Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarkers in primary care.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting.Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- The Profile of the Italian Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia in the Context of New Drugs in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Performing multiple biomarker tests delays initiation of amyloid-targeting treatments.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Simulation of Alzheimer's diagnostic flows with blood biomarker test options in Japan.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Therapeutic time window of disease-modifying therapy for early Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
- Preparedness and quality of dementia care in an Italian health authority when introducing anti-Aβ therapies.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
- Obstacles and solutions for implementing amyloid-targeting treatments in Europe.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of disease-modifying Alzheimer's (AD) treatments provides new hope to patients and families but concerns have been raised about the preparedness of healthcare systems to provide timely access to such treatments because of a combination of a complex diagnostic process and a large prevalent pool.
objectivesWe assess the preparedness of Sweden, a high-income country known for its dementia-friendly policies, to diagnose AD patients eligible for treatment within a six-month window, given current capacity for specialist evaluations and biomarker testing. We calculate the investment requirements for Sweden to achieve this target over a timeframe of 20 years.
designDesk research to identify data for population, mortality, disease burden, cost of services and current capacity, expert consultation to inform assumptions about patient journey, and use of a Markov model to predict waiting times. The model simulates the patients' journey through different evaluation stages: initial evaluation by a primary care specialist, neurocognitive testing by an AD specialist, and confirmatory biomarker testing with PET scanning or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing. The model assumes specialist appointments and PET scans are capacity constrained, and patients progress from cognitively normal to MCI and from MCI to dementia in the resulting waiting times. MEASUREMENTS: Projected waiting times for diagnosis of eligibility for disease-modifying Alzheimer's treatment from 2023 to 2042 assuming current capacity, assuming 20% of Swedish residents aged 60 years and above would seek an evaluation for cognitive decline. Investments required to scale capacity up to reach target of providing diagnosis within six months on average.
resultsInitial average waiting times for AD specialist appointments would be around 21 months in 2023 and remain around 55 months through 2042, as demand would continue to outstrip supply throughout the 20-year model horizon. Waiting times for biomarker testing would be stable at less than four weeks, as patients would be held up in the queue for their first specialist consultations, and use of CSF testing is widely accepted in Sweden. An additional 25% of AD specialists would have to be added above the current growth trend to reduce waiting times to less than 6 months at an average annual cost of approximately 805 million SEK. The increased cost of volume of biomarker testing would amount to about 106 million SEK per year.
conclusionsAt current capacity, the Swedish healthcare system is unable to provide timely diagnosis of patients eligible for disease-modifying AD treatment. Although future diagnostic technologies, such as digital cognitive assessments and blood tests for the AD pathology, might decrease demand for capacity-constrained services, substantial investments will be required to meet a target of less than six months of waiting time for a diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.