ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
Automatic Root Length Estimation from Images Acquired In Situ without Segmentation.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RootQuantV2: Adapting a Vision Foundation Model for Root-Trait Regression from Minirhizotron Imagery.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Quantification of lettuce leaf DUS test traits and phenotypic fingerprint construction for variety identification.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- LenRuler: a rice-centric method for automated radicle length measurement with multicrop validation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Convolutional neural networks combined with conventional filtering to semantically segment plant roots in rapidly scanned X-ray computed tomography volumes with high noise levels.Plant methods · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image-based root phenotyping technologies, including the minirhizotron (MR), have expanded our understanding of the in situ root responses to changing environmental conditions. The conventional manual methods used to analyze MR images are time-consuming, limiting their implementation. This study presents an adaptation of our previously developed convolutional neural network-based models to estimate the total (cumulative) root length (TRL) per MR image without requiring segmentation. Training data were derived from manual annotations in Rootfly, commonly used software for MR image analysis. We compared TRL estimation with 2 models, a regression-based model and a detection-based model that detects the annotated points along the roots. Notably, the detection-based model can assist in examining human annotations by providing a visual inspection of roots in MR images. The models were trained and tested with 4,015 images acquired using 2 MR system types (manual and automated) and from 4 crop species (corn, pepper, melon, and tomato) grown under various abiotic stresses. These datasets are made publicly available as part of this publication. The coefficients of determination (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.