Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38230325›Full record

ArticleClinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2024

Understanding Providers' Readiness and Attitudes Toward Autoantibody Screening: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Emma Ospelt, Holly Hardison, Nicole Rioles, Nudrat Noor, Ruth S Weinstock, Kristina Cossen, Priyanka Mathias, Allison Smego, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Osagie Ebekozien and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improving Care for People With Type 1 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma OspeltT1D Exchange, Boston, MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-001X
Holly HardisonT1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
Nicole RiolesT1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
Nudrat NoorT1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
Ruth S WeinstockSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
Kristina CossenChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.
Priyanka MathiasAlbert Einstein College of Medicine-Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Allison SmegoUniversity of Utah, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, UT.
Nestoras MathioudakisAdult Endocrinology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Osagie EbekozienT1D Exchange, Boston, MA.
T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for autoantibodies associated with type 1 diabetes can identify people most at risk for progressing to clinical type 1 diabetes and provide an opportunity for early intervention. Drawbacks and barriers to screening exist, and concerns arise, as methods for disease prevention are limited and no cure exists today. The availability of novel treatment options such as teplizumab to delay progression to clinical type 1 diabetes in high-risk individuals has led to the reassessment of screening programs. This study explored awareness, readiness, and attitudes of endocrinology providers toward type 1 diabetes autoantibody screening.

Identifiers

PMID38230325
PMCPMC10788649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.