Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229953›Full record

ReviewMelanoma management2023

Organ-sparing central pelvic compartment resection for the treatment of vulvo-vaginal melanomas.

Mark McGowan, Brent O'Carrigan, Filipe Correia Martins, Krishnayan Haldar, Pubudu Pathiraja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Melanoma management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark McGowanDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8630-9538
Brent O'CarriganDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8187-6298
Filipe Correia MartinsDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, University College Hospital, London, NW1 2PG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-8206
Krishnayan HaldarDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9206-2625
Pubudu PathirajaDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-9466

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvo-vaginal melanomas are one of the rarest gynecological oncology diseases with a poor survival compared with other malignancies. The 5-year survival varies from 13% to 32.3%. Vulvo-vaginal melanomas involving the upper 2/3rds of the vagina are usually treated with total pelvic exenteration (TPE). TPE surgery carries a 50% risk of major complications and also morbidity associated with double stomas. Central pelvic compartment resection is a novel organ-sparing surgical approach entailing radical total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy, laparoscopic vaginectomy and vulvectomy to reduce morbidity compared with TPE. Permanent suprapubic catheters are used if there is urethral involvement but require quality of life studies to assess their long-term outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID38229953
PMCPMC10789441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.