Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229898›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Promoting equity, inclusion, and efficiency: A team science approach to the development of authorship guidelines for a multi-disciplinary research team.

Hannah Lewis, Barbara Biesecker, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Katherine Anderson, Galen Joseph, Charisma L Jenkins, Joanna E Bulkley, Michael C Leo, Katrina A B Goddard, Benjamin S Wilfond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah LewisTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barbara BieseckerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Sandra Soo-Jin LeeDepartment of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine AndersonDenver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Galen JosephDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charisma L JenkinsDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Joanna E BulkleyDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Michael C LeoDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Katrina A B GoddardDepartment of Translational and Applied Genomics, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Benjamin S WilfondTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2671-9860
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USCal Humanities · USDenver Health Medical Center · USNational Institutes of Health · USRTI International · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large research teams and consortia present challenges for authorship. The number of disciplines involved in the research can further complicate approaches to manuscript development and leadership. The CHARM team, representing a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional genomics implementation study, participated in facilitated discussions inspired by team science methodologies. The discussions were centered on team members' past experiences with authorship and perspectives on authorship in a large research team context. Team members identified challenges and opportunities that were used to create guidelines and administrative tools to support manuscript development. The guidelines were organized by the three values of equity, inclusion, and efficiency and included eight principles. A visual dashboard was created to allow all team members to see who was leading or involved in each paper. Additional tools to promote equity, inclusion, and efficiency included providing standardized project management for each manuscript and making "concept sheets" for each manuscript accessible to all team members. The process used in CHARM can be used by other large research teams and consortia to equitably distribute lead authorship opportunities, foster coauthor inclusion, and efficiently work with large authorship groups.

Indexed as

authorshipequitymultidisciplinary researchTeam science

Identifiers

PMID38229898
PMCPMC10790100
OpenAlexW4389203685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.