Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229872›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Use of Social Media in Orthopaedic Surgery Training and Practice: A Systematic Review.

Aliya G Feroe, Arthur J Only, Jerome C Murray, Lynsey R Malin, Nizar Mikhael, Ryan S Selley, Ryan R Fader, Mahad M Hassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Social media best practices for the spine care professional.North American Spine Society journal · 2025
    Article
  5. TikTok and Orthopaedic Education: Engaging the Next Generation of Patients.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  6. Comparative Analysis of Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Information on Popular Social Media Platforms.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. From the Editor.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aliya G FeroeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-6631
Arthur J OnlyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-2685
Jerome C MurrayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-3038
Lynsey R MalinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0441-462X
Nizar MikhaelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Ryan S SelleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4100-6962
Ryan R FaderAllina Health Orthopedics, Plymouth, Minnesota.
Mahad M HassanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2316-6495

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social media use has grown across healthcare delivery and practice, with dramatic changes occurring in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comprehensive systematic review to determine the current landscape of social media use by (1) orthopaedic surgery residencies/fellowship training programs and (2) individual orthopaedic surgeons and the change in use over time. Methods: We searched 3 electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase) from their inception to April 2022 for all studies that analyzed the use of social media in orthopaedic surgery. Two reviewers independently determined study eligibility, rated study quality, and extracted data. Methodology was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included, of which 11 analyzed social media use by orthopaedic surgery residency and fellowship training programs and 17 examined its use by individual orthopaedic surgeons. Among residency and fellowship programs, Instagram was identified as the most common platform used, with 42% to 88% of programs reporting program-specific Instagram accounts, followed by Twitter/X (20%-52%) and Facebook (10%-38%). Social media was most commonly used by programs for recruitment and information dissemination to prospective residency applicants (82% and 73% of included studies, respectively). After the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 620% and 177% increase in the number of training programs with Instagram and Twitter/X accounts, respectively. Individual use of social media ranged from 1.7% to 76% (Twitter/X), 10% to 73% (Facebook), 0% to 61% (Instagram), 22% to 61% (LinkedIn), and 6.5% to 56% (YouTube). Conclusions: Instagram, Twitter/X, and Facebook are the premier platforms that patients, residency applicants, and institutions frequent. With the continued growth of social media use anticipated, it will be critical for institutions and individuals to create and abide by guidelines outlining respectful and professional integration of social media into practice. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Identifiers

PMID38229872
PMCPMC10786589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.