ArticleGland surgery2023
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast lesions: what diagnostic models could be used for lesions of different sizes?
Article in Gland surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal imaging features of primary breast epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic features and inflammatory status associated with tumor size in breast invasive ductal carcinoma.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- The value of contrast-enhanced energy-spectrum mammography combined with clinical indicators in detecting breast cancer in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies show the size of lesions could affect the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). It is unclear whether CEUS has good diagnostic performance for lesions ≤2.0 and ≤1.0 cm. It is beneficial for the early diagnosis to explore the application of CEUS in breast lesions of different sizes. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic performance of CEUS and explore diagnostic models better suited to breast lesions of different sizes. Methods: A total of 1,059 lesions (656 benign and 403 malignant) examined by ultrasound and CEUS with definite pathological results were included in this retrospective study and divided into training (n=847) and validation (n=212) sets. All lesions were divided into three groups according to size. Diagnostic models (M Results: The median age of patients was 45±11 years (range, 18-80 years). The AUC values of M Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of CEUS was closely related to lesion size. Establishing a new diagnostic model for lesions ≤1.0 cm can improve the CEUS diagnostic performance for breast lesions ≤1.0 cm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.