ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Development of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale for Patients with Bile Duct Carcinoma Catheterized After Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangial Drainage: A Validity and Reliability Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We develop the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) for patients with bile duct carcinoma catheterized after percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and test the reliability and validity of the scale, so as to provide a quantitative tool for evaluating the discharge readiness of patients catheterized after PTCD. Methods: The initial scale was developed following literature review, qualitative interviews, expert consultation, and other methods based on Meleis' Theory of Transition. We selected a total of 286 patients with bile duct carcinoma catheterized after PTCD from four tertiary A-grade hospitals in Nantong City. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using the initial scale to test the validity and reliability of the scale. Results: RHDS for patients catheterized post-PTCD consisted of five dimensions, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 74.6%. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.856, and that of each dimension was between 0.740 and 0.891; the scale-content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.875. Conclusion: RHDS for patients with bile duct carcinoma catheterized after PTCD developed in this study, has good reliability and validity, and can be a useful tool for evaluating the discharge readiness of patients with bile duct carcinoma catheterized after PTCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.