ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2024
A high-throughput LC-MS/MS assay for piperaquine from dried blood spots: Improving malaria treatment in resource-limited settings.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Weekly dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus monthly sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria chemoprevention in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda and Malawi (CHEMCHA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Development and validation of UHPLC-MS/MS methods for determination of piperaquine in quantitative dried blood samples and microvolume plasma samples.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2026Article
- Genotype Complexity Modulates Antimalarial Susceptibility in vitro.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review on the Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis of Piperaquine.Current drug metabolism · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malaria is a parasitic disease that affects many of the poorest economies, resulting in approximately 241 million clinical episodes and 627,000 deaths annually. Piperaquine, when administered with dihydroartemisinin, is an effective drug against the disease. Drug concentration measurements taken on day 7 after treatment initiation have been shown to be a good predictor of therapeutic success with piperaquine. A simple capillary blood collection technique, where blood is dried onto filter paper, is especially suitable for drug studies in remote areas or resource-limited settings or when taking samples from children, toddlers, and infants. Methods: Three 3.2 mm discs were punched out from a dried blood spot (DBS) and then extracted in a 96-well plate using solid phase extraction on a fully automated liquid handling system. The analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS with a calibration range of 3 - 1000 ng/mL. Results: The recovery rate was approximately 54-72 %, and the relative standard deviation was below 9 % for low, middle and high quality control levels. The LC-MS/MS quantification limit of 3 ng/mL is sensitive enough to detect piperaquine for up to 4-8 weeks after drug administration, which is crucial when evaluating recrudescence and drug resistance development. While different hematocrit levels can affect DBS drug measurements, the effect was minimal for piperaquine. Conclusion: A sensitive LC-MS/MS method, in combination with fully automated extraction in a 96-well plate format, was developed and validated for the quantification of piperaquine in DBS. The assay was implemented in a bioanalytical laboratory for processing large-scale clinical trial samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.