Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229591›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2024

Leveraging Machine Learning for Size and Shape Analysis of Nanoparticles: A Shortcut to Electron Microscopy.

Christina Glaubitz, Amélie Bazzoni, Liliane Ackermann-Hirschi, Laura Baraldi, Moritz Haeffner, Roman Fortunatus, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Sandor Balog, Alke Petri-Fink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christina GlaubitzAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Amélie BazzoniAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0615-9592
Liliane Ackermann-HirschiAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Laura BaraldiDepartment of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 17/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.
Moritz HaeffnerAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Roman FortunatusAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.
Barbara Rothen-RutishauserAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-9366
Sandor BalogAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-9845
Alke Petri-FinkAdolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3952-7849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing nanoparticles (NPs) is crucial in nanoscience due to the direct influence of their physiochemical properties on their behavior. Various experimental techniques exist to analyze the size and shape of NPs, each with advantages, limitations, proneness to uncertainty, and resource requirements. One of them is electron microscopy (EM), often considered the gold standard, which offers visualization of the primary particles. However, despite its advantages, EM can be expensive, less accessible, and difficult to apply during dynamic processes. Therefore, using EM for specific experimental conditions, such as observing dynamic processes or visualizing low-contrast particles, is challenging. This study showcases the potential of machine learning in deriving EM parameters by utilizing cost-effective and dynamic techniques such as dynamic light scattering (DLS) and UV-vis spectroscopy. Our developed model successfully predicts the size and shape parameters of gold NPs based on DLS and UV-vis results. Furthermore, we demonstrate the practicality of our model in situations in which conducting EM measurements presents a challenge: Tracking in situ the synthesis of 100 nm gold NPs.

Identifiers

PMID38229591
PMCPMC10788956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.