ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024
Values of Caprini Risk Assessment Scale and D-Dimer for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism During Puerperium.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer for predicting postpartum venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Thrombosis journal · 2026Review
- Effects of comprehensive nursing intervention on the postoperative gastrointestinal function and complications in patients undergoing endoscopic polypectomy.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Implications of Activity of Daily Living for Clinical Care of Older Adults Undergoing Urological Surgery-A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Analysis on the causes of unsatisfactory prevention effect of postpartum VTE in Chinese women.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of a predictive model for deep vein thrombosis in burn patients based on the Caprini Risk Assessment Scale.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the predictive value of the combination of the Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) and D-dimer for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during puerperium. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study. Thirty-one puerperium patients with VTE were included as cases, and 279 puerperium women without VTE were matched to cases according to age, number of fetuses, birth day and delivery mode at the ratio of 9:1. Demographic data, clinical data and laboratory parameters within postpartum 24 h were collected. Multivariate analysis, employing the forward stepwise model, was conducted to identify independent factors associated with VTE during puerperium. The predictive values of Caprini RAM, D-dimer and their combination were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under curve (AUC) was compared using Results: Univariate analysis demonstrated that there were significant differences in D-dimer levels, Caprini score, scarred uterus, adherent placenta, postpartum hemorrhage and intrauterine infection between cases and controls ( Conclusion: The combination of the Caprini RAM and D-dimer could significantly elevate the predictive value for VTE during puerperium, and this new tool had the potential in the prediction of VTE during puerperium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.