Observational studyPrimary health care research & development2024
Double positivity for rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP autoantibodies: improving referral from primary care of patients suspected of having rheumatoid arthritis.
Observational study in Primary health care research & development, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [New biomarker-based diagnostic tests : Early and precise diagnosis of rheumatological diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Review
- Prevalence of Various Systemic and Organ-Specific Autoimmune Markers in Addison's Disease Patients Compared to Healthy Controls.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic progressive autoimmune inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and mortality. The course of the disease can be modified if diagnosis is early and treatment appropriate.
aimIn this study, we aimed to evaluate a new strategy for early identification of RA patients in primary care settings (the 'diagnostic bottleneck') based on serological biomarkers and to manage inappropriate rheumatoid factor (RF) laboratory test requests.
methodA two-arm study was carried out. The first arm corresponded to a retrospective observational descriptive study of patients referred for RF testing from primary care using the current laboratory workflow. The second arm included the following prospective interventions: cancelation of RF requests corresponding to patients with previous negative results for RF over a one-year period; and automatic reflex testing antibodies against cyclic citrullinated proteins (anti-CCP) for patients displaying RF values >30 IU/ml. Outcomes from both arms were then compared.
findingsAs double positivity for RF and anti-CCP notably increases the positive likelihood ratio of RA. The intervention enabled a reduction of 2813 tests in 22 months. Moreover, the frequency of unnecessary referrals was reduced from 22% to 8.2%, while that of missed patients decreased slightly (from 21% to 16%), with the number of patients diagnosed per RF request remaining unchanged. In terms of costs, we saved 19.4 RF tests per anti-CCP test added.We developed a simple and cost-effective strategy for reducing the time to diagnosis of RA that can improve patients' quality of life. This approach was supported by primary and specialised care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.