Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229498›Full record

ArticleCell transplantation

A Comparison Between

Han Na Suh, Ju Young Lee, Hee Jung Kang, Eun Mi Park, Ik Jin Yun, Wan Seop Kim, Kimyung Choi, Jeong Ho Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Han Na SuhAnimal Model Research Group, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jeongeup, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7647-7249
Ju Young LeeAnimal Model Research Group, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jeongeup, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jung KangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea.
Eun Mi ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea.
Ik Jin YunDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Wan Seop KimDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Kimyung ChoiDepartment of Transgenic Animal Research, Optipharm Inc, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Ho HwangAnimal Model Research Group, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jeongeup, Republic of Korea.
Korea Institute of Toxicology · KRHallym University · KRKonkuk University · KRKomipharm International (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because there is a shortage of donor kidneys, researchers are exploring the possibility of using genetically modified pig kidneys for transplantation. Approaches involving knockout of carbohydrate genes or knockin of protective proteins have been attempted to determine the best gene modifications. In this study, we utilized

Indexed as

TransplantsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGraft RejectionKidneyPrimatesSwineTransplantation, Heterologousgenetically modified pigkidney transplantationpig-to-NHPsxenograft

Identifiers

PMID38229498
PMCPMC10798062
OpenAlexW4390951351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.