Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229472›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Feasibility evaluation of radiotherapy positioning system guided by augmented reality and point cloud registration.

Shaozhuang Zhai, Ziwen Wei, Xiaolong Wu, Ligang Xing, Jinming Yu, Junchao Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaozhuang ZhaiSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, P.R. China.
Ziwen WeiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, P.R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5954-3825
Xiaolong WuAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, P.R. China.
Ligang XingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Jinming YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Shandong University, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Junchao QianSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, P.R. China.

Funding

Anhui Province Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists 2208085J10China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2019M652403Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center, CAS 2019HSC-CIP003National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871085National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271519National Natural Science Foundation of China U1932158Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019LZL018Project of Postdoctoral Innovation of Shandong Province 202002048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a radiotherapy positioning system based on Point Cloud Registration (PCR) and Augmented Reality (AR), and to verify its feasibility.

methodsThe optimal steps of PCR were investigated, and virtual positioning experiments were designed to evaluate its accuracy and speed. AR was implemented by Unity 3D and Vuforia for initial position correction, and PCR for precision registration, to achieve the proposed radiotherapy positioning system. Feasibility of the proposed system was evaluated through phantom positioning tests as well as real human positioning tests. Real human tests involved breath-holding positioning and free-breathing positioning tests. Evaluation metrics included 6 Degree of Freedom (DOF) deviations and Distance (D) errors. Additionally, the interaction between CBCT and the proposed system was envisaged through CBCT and optical cross-source PCR.

resultsPoint-to-plane iterative Closest Point (ICP), statistical filtering, uniform down-sampling, and optimal sampling ratio were determined for PCR procedure. In virtual positioning tests, a single registration took only 0.111 s, and the average D error for 15 patients was 0.015 ± 0.029 mm., Errors of phantom tests were at the sub-millimeter level, with an average D error of 0.6 ± 0.2 mm. In the real human positioning tests, the average accuracy of breath-holding positioning was still at the sub-millimeter level, where the errors of X, Y and Z axes were 0.59 ± 0.12 mm, 0.54 ± 0.12 mm, and 0.52 ± 0.09 mm, and the average D error was 0.96 ± 0.22 mm. In the free-breathing positioning, the average errors in X, Y, and Z axes were still less than 1 mm. Although the mean D error was 1.93 ± 0.36 mm, it still falls within a clinically acceptable error margin.

conclusionThe AR and PCR-guided radiotherapy positioning system enables markerless, radiation-free and high-accuracy positioning, which is feasible in real-world scenarios.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, Imagingaugmented realityICPpoint cloud registrationradiotherapy positioningvisualization

Identifiers

PMID38229472
PMCPMC11005969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.