Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229303›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to lactic acid enantiomers.

Polina Drozdova, Anton Gurkov, Alexandra Saranchina, Anastasia Vlasevskaya, Elena Zolotovskaya, Elizaveta Indosova, Maxim Timofeyev, Ekaterina Borvinskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Polina DrozdovaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation. drozdovapb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3955-6105
Anton GurkovIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8390-1570
Alexandra SaranchinaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-1525
Anastasia VlasevskayaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2347-7089
Elena ZolotovskayaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-4224
Elizaveta IndosovaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3493-7637
Maxim TimofeyevIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5250-6818
Ekaterina BorvinskayaIrkutsk State University, Karl-Marx Str. 1, Irkutsk, 664025, Russian Federation. borvinska@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-1440
Irkutsk State University · RUBaikal State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 20-64-47011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The model yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a popular object for both fundamental and applied research, including the development of biosensors and industrial production of pharmaceutical compounds. However, despite multiple studies exploring S. cerevisiae transcriptional response to various substances, this response is unknown for some substances produced in yeast, such as D-lactic acid (DLA). Here, we explore the transcriptional response of the BY4742 strain to a wide range of DLA concentrations (from 0.05 to 45 mM), and compare it to the response to 45 mM L-lactic acid (LLA). We recorded a response to 5 and 45 mM DLA (125 and 113 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), respectively; > 50% shared) and a less pronounced response to 45 mM LLA (63 DEGs; > 30% shared with at least one DLA treatment). Our data did not reveal natural yeast promoters quantitatively sensing DLA but provide the first description of the transcriptome-wide response to DLA and enrich our understanding of the LLA response. Some DLA-activated genes were indeed related to lactate metabolism, as well as iron uptake and cell wall structure. Additional analyses showed that at least some of these genes were activated only by acidic form of DLA but not its salt, revealing the role of pH. The list of LLA-responsive genes was similar to those published previously and also included iron uptake and cell wall genes, as well as genes responding to other weak acids. These data might be instrumental for optimization of lactate production in yeast and yeast co-cultivation with lactic acid bacteria. KEY POINTS: • We present the first dataset on yeast transcriptional response to DLA. • Differential gene expression was correlated with yeast growth inhibition. • The transcriptome response to DLA was richer in comparison to LLA.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsIronLactic AcidIronLactic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBudding yeastD-lactateLactic acidL-lactateLow pH stressRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID38229303
PMCPMC10787881
OpenAlexW4390839296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.