Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229130›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey.

Rumbidzai N Mutsekwa, Katrina L Campbell, Russell Canavan, Rebecca L Angus, Liza-Jane McBride, Joshua M Byrnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rumbidzai N MutsekwaGold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nutrition and Food Services, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia. rumbidzai.mutsekwa@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-3026
Katrina L CampbellCentre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Sir Samuel Griffith Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4479-1284
Russell CanavanGastroenterology Department, Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-3219
Rebecca L AngusGold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Nutrition and Food Services, 1 Hospital Boulevard Southport, Southport, Queensland, 4215, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-9641
Liza-Jane McBrideDepartment of Health, Clinical Excellence 15 Butterfield Street, Herston, Queensland, 4006, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-5934
Joshua M ByrnesCentre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine, Sir Samuel Griffith Centre, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6562-711X

Funding

Gold Coast Hospital and Health ServiceCollaborative Research Grant RGS20190041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional role substitution models of care have emerged as a key strategy to address increasing healthcare demand. Gaining insights from those actively engaged in the process of these models' implementation and evaluation is pivotal to ensuring sustainability and further successful implementation. The purpose of this study was to describe allied-health clinicians' perceptions, practice, and experiences of healthcare performance evaluation in professional role substitution models of care.

methodsData were collected via an online platform between 22 June - 22 July 2022 using a combination of convenience and network-based sampling of allied-health clinicians involved or interested in the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models of care. Clinicians answered 25 questions which consisted of demographic and targeted questions regarding performance evaluation across six domains of healthcare quality (effectiveness, safety, appropriateness, access & equity, continuity of care, and cost, efficiency, productivity & sustainability).

resultsA total of 102 clinicians accessed the survey, with 72 providing complete survey data. Eleven allied-health professions were represented, working across twelve specialities in thirteen hospital and health services. Whilst most allied-health clinicians (93-100%) supported measuring performance in each of the six healthcare quality domains, only 26-58% were measuring these domains in practice. Allied-health leadership support (62.5%), clinician drive (62.5%), consumer engagement (50%) and medical support (46%) were enablers whilst a lack of resources (human, time, financial (47%)), healthcare performance frameworks and/or policies (40%) were identified as barriers. Given the opportunity, clinicians would invest the most financial resources in digital solutions as a core strategy to improve performance evaluation.

conclusionsAllied-health professionals expressed strong support for principles of performance evaluation, however in practice, performance evaluation is still in its infancy in professional role substitution models of care. Organisations can implement strategies that maximise the enablers whilst addressing barriers identified to improve performance evaluation in these models of care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareQuality of Health CareAllied Health PersonnelHospitalsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesEvaluationExpanded scopeExtended scopeMeasuring performanceProfessional role substitution

Identifiers

PMID38229130
PMCPMC10790527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.