Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229105›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2024

Effectiveness of typodont, quail egg and virtual simulation for ultrasonic periodontal scaling teaching among pre-clinical students: a randomized trial.

Jiarun Fu, Zhentao Lao, Li Gao, Shiwen Wu, Xin Huang, Chuanjiang Zhao, Panpan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiarun FuHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Zhentao LaoHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Li GaoHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Shiwen WuHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Xin HuangHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China.
Chuanjiang Zhao *Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China. zhaochj@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Panpan Wang *Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.55 Linyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510055, China. wangpp5@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNHospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen UniversityStomatology Hospital · CN

Funding

Undergraduate Education Quality Program of Sun Yat-Sen University Academic Affairs [2022] No. 20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of three different techniques, namely virtual simulation technology (VS), traditional pathological typodont (TT), and quail egg (QE), in pre-clinical training of periodontal ultrasonic scaling. It also aimed to propose an integrated teaching approach for ultrasonic scaling teaching.

methodsThis single-blind randomized multi-arm trial enrolled 108 fourth-year students from Guanghua School of Stomatology at Sun Yat-sen University. The participants were randomly, evenly assigned to VS, TT, or QE group. First, the participants received theoretical review on ultrasonic scaling and demonstrative teaching. Then in the 90-minute operation training by group, students used traditional typodont equipped in head-simulators, raw quail eggs, or scaling module of the UniDental VS system respectively. Then all participants practiced on pathological models for 30 min. In the final operation examination, participants were instructed to remove the supra- and sub-gingival calculi pre-set on designated teeth by ultrasonic scalers within 30 min. Their performances were evaluated by residual calculus rate and a multi-perspective scoring scale. After the examination, questionnaires were provided to assess the teaching effects of each method and the fidelity of VS. Statistical analysis was carried out using one-way, two-way ANOVA, and multiple t-test.

resultsStudents in VS group had significant higher total test scores than QE group (87.89 ± 6.81, 83.53 ± 8.14) and TT group (85.03 ± 6.81). VS group scored higher in several dimensional comparisons with the other two groups, especially in difficult situations. QE group had higher scores particularly in force application and supra-gingival scaling. TT group scored the highest in pivot stability practice and body position training. Students gave higher scores when assessing the fidelity of VS than experienced teachers.

conclusionThe study highlights the importance of specialized pre-clinical training on ultrasonic scaling for dental students. The methods adopted in current study (VS, TT and QE) each offered unique advantages in education, which can be combined to create an integrative teaching procedure. This procedure aims to provide an effective, advisable and normative pre-clinical training procedure for ultrasonic scaling. By utilizing the strengths of each method, dental educators can deliver high-quality training and ensure that students are well-prepared for clinical practice.

Indexed as

StudentsUltrasonicsClinical CompetenceDental ScalingGingivaHumansSingle-Blind MethodTeachingIntegrated teachingPre-clinical educationQuail eggTeaching effectTypodontUltrasonic periodontal scalingVirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID38229105
PMCPMC10790488
OpenAlexW4390911836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.