Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229056›Full record

ReviewBMC proceedings2024

Editorial viewpoints of scientific publishing for early-career research scientists.

Pei-Chen Peng, Fadie T Coleman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMC proceedings, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Maximizing the Impact of Your Academic Scholarship: Strategies for Early Career Professionals.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pei-Chen Peng *Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. pei-chen.peng@cshs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5004-4322
Fadie T Coleman *Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

Research and Educational Career Development Program for Cell Biologists: An Integrated ApproachR25GM116707 · NIGMS · AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR CELL BIOLOGY · PI EDWARDS, ASHANTI, SEGARRA, VERONICA A. · 2016 to 2022
$3.4M
Identifying new drivers of ovarian cancer from the non-coding genome by converging germline risk variants and somatic mutationsR00CA256519 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI PENG, PEI-CHEN · 2023 to 2025
$745k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA256519NCI NIH HHS R00CA256519NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM116707NIGMS NIH HHS R25GM116707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the structure and composition of the scientific manuscript is well known within scientific communities, insider knowledge such as the tricks of the trade and editorial viewpoints of scientific publishing are often less known to early-career research scientists. This article focuses on the key aspects of scientific publishing, including tips for success geared towards senior postdocs and junior faculty. It also highlights important considerations for getting manuscripts published in an efficient and successful manner.

Indexed as

Career developmentEarly-career scientistsJournal submissionScientific writing

Identifiers

PMID38229056
PMCPMC10792771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.