Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229041›Full record

ReviewBMC urology2024

Seminal papers in urology: two-year outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for refractory urgency urinary incontinence: a Randomized Trial.

Haidar Hadri Bin Abd Wahab, Michael O'Callaghan

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewLetter
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haidar Hadri Bin Abd WahabUrology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
Michael O'CallaghanUrology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia. Michael.ocallaghan@health.sa.gov.au.
Flinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this critical review, we explore the study design, strengths and limitations of the paper: "Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial." The paper reports 24 month follow-up data of the landmark ROSETTA trial. This multi-centre, open-labelled parallel randomised trial allocated females 1:1 to receive Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM) or OnabotulinumtoxinA(BTX) 200 units (U). The primary outcome was change in mean daily urinary urgency incontinence episodes (UUIE) over 24 months. The study did not demonstrate a difference between treatments (-3.88 vs. -3.50 episodes per day), however women treated with BTX were more satisfied; but reported higher rates of UTI. The two treatments provide comparable third-line treatment options for patients with refractory urgency urinary incontinence.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ATranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary IncontinenceUrologyFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, UrgeBotulinum Toxins, Type AOnabotulinumtoxinARandomized controlled trialSacral NeuromodulationUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID38229041
PMCPMC10792858
OpenAlexW4390907052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.