Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38229025›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2024

Recognition of cognitive dysfunction in hospitalised older patients: a flash mob study.

Fleur C W Visser, Marlise E A van Eersel, Liesbeth Hempenius, Nicolaas A Verwey, Caterina Band, Jessica M van der Bol, Kris Boudestein, Suzanne C van Dijk, Robbert Gobbens, Cornelis S van der Hooft and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Fleur C W VisserDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Alzheimer Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, AA43, The Netherlands. f.c.w.visser@umcg.nl.
Marlise E A van EerselDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Alzheimer Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, AA43, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth HempeniusGeriatric Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Nicolaas A VerweyNeurology and Geriatric Department, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Caterina BandSpaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Jessica M van der BolReinier de Graaf Hospital, Geriatric Medicine, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kris BoudesteinDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne C van DijkDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Schiedam, The Netherlands.
Robbert GobbensFaculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis S van der HooftDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Tjongerschans Ziekenhuis, Heerenveen, The Netherlands.
Adriaan M KamperDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Rikje RuiterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Walther SipersDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen-Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Birgit N A SpoelstraDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Josephine StoffelsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Aging & Later Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dyane J Stolwijk-WoudstraGeriatric Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Karlijn J van StralenSpaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Astrid M van StrienDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Marjolein A WijngaardenLeiden University Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Section Geriatrics, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marian WintersDepartments of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Fijanne StrijkertDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Alzheimer Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, AA43, The Netherlands.
Barbara C van MunsterDepartment of Geriatric Medicine and Alzheimer Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, AA43, The Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLIsala · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLFranciscus Vlietland · NLInholland University of Applied Sciences · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

ZonMw #73305095007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is important that healthcare professionals recognise cognitive dysfunction in hospitalised older patients in order to address associated care needs, such as enhanced involvement of relatives and extra cognitive and functional support. However, studies analysing medical records suggest that healthcare professionals have low awareness of cognitive dysfunction in hospitalised older patients. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in hospitalised older patients, the percentage of patients in which cognitive dysfunction was recognised by healthcare professionals, and which variables were associated with recognition.

methodsA multicentre, nationwide, cross-sectional observational study was conducted on a single day using a flash mob study design in thirteen university and general hospitals in the Netherlands. Cognitive function was assessed in hospitalised patients aged ≥ 65 years old, who were admitted to medical and surgical wards. A Mini-Cog score of < 3 out of 5 indicated cognitive dysfunction. The attending nurses and physicians were asked whether they suspected cognitive dysfunction in their patient. Variables associated with recognition of cognitive dysfunction were assessed using multilevel and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

results347 of 757 enrolled patients (46%) showed cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive dysfunction was recognised by attending nurses in 137 of 323 patients (42%) and by physicians in 156 patients (48%). In 135 patients (42%), cognitive dysfunction was not recognised by either the attending nurse or physician. Recognition of cognitive dysfunction was better at a lower Mini-Cog score, with the best recognition in patients with the lowest scores. Patients with a Mini-Cog score < 3 were best recognised in the geriatric department (69% by nurses and 72% by physicians).

conclusionCognitive dysfunction is common in hospitalised older patients and is poorly recognised by healthcare professionals. This study highlights the need to improve recognition of cognitive dysfunction in hospitalised older patients, particularly in individuals with less apparent cognitive dysfunction. The high proportion of older patients with cognitive dysfunction suggests that it may be beneficial to provide care tailored to cognitive dysfunction for all hospitalised older patients.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDeliriumAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHospitalizationHumansPatientsCognitive dysfunctionDeliriumDementiaHospital admissionOlder patients

Identifiers

PMID38229025
PMCPMC10790457
OpenAlexW4390911829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.